Follow us on Twitter!

    follow me on Twitter

    Partners


    Blog powered by Typepad

    « Guest Post: Second Life Launches Disaster Preparedness Sims | Main | Dusan Writer on Pixels, Policy, and the Barbarians at the Gate »

    10/26/2009

    TrackBack

    TrackBack URL for this entry:
    http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a0120a51c39be970b0120a61c7979970b

    Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Curious Case of Racism in Second Life:

    Comments

    Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

    This was a pretty ridiculous study... not in a bad way... just... ridiculous.
    First off: how they ask is what matters, not how they look.
    Secondly: anyone who's a seasoned SLer isn't really even paying attention to avatar look anymore. In fact, I'd tend to think most chat and negotiations take place in IM. If someone were asking me for help or to hire me, I would receive an IM.
    Third: They didn't record who accepted the offer to help. Because, clearly only idiots accepted the 2 hour photo shoot... and idiots... well, they don't think straight.
    ... but hey.. this is just me. I'm willing to work with any skin color avatar, and beyond that, I'll work with any animal, any robot, any tiny, any anything.... what's the difference?!?!
    But, I refuse to work with the stupid idiots.

    Why not look into avatar height? Honestly, I rarely see people give AV skin color a second look (pun intended). (=_=)

    But, I often hear of people showing up at clubs, stores, and such and either getting shouted out of the place or flat out banned over their height. Regardless of being a child, fairie, doll, elf, or imp avatar. (=_=)

    Mind you, I ain't been hit by that. My avatar is 5"1' and 80% of my time is in an adult sim... Where people recognise scale and tower of terror avatars are seen as they are. (^_^)y

    I, too, question the significance of this study (perhaps more accurately, its interpretation). Not only is the methodology confusing to the lay reader, it addresses only one relatively minor aspect of avatar appearance out of the many possible. Want to experience "racism" first-hand in Second Life? Try being a furry.

    I think that this is a serious issue in SL, I think it is wrong to dismiss it. Although in 'experiments' of this type, it is difficult to control all the variables, the fact is that the same person was asking the questions and getting a significantly different response depending on the skin colour of their avatar. There are comparatively few black avatars, hardly any decent black skins and rarely do you see black hair for sale. We have to ask why are black people 'choosing' or being forced to choose white skins. If skin colour did not matter then sl would be multi-coloured and it very noticeably is not. Racism is rife whether we like it or not and pretending it is not only serves to perpetuate both the myth and the racism.

    Interesting piece. It's not particularly surprising that there would be some DITF associated with having a dark-skinned avatar, for several reasons. Virtual worlds in the West still lie on the far side of the digital divide -- accessing them requires a very strong PC and solid broadband, and the fact that they run on downloadable clients limits access from schools, libraries, and other places that make PCs more generally available, but don't permit download and installation of software. They're also not generally available on mobile, which is the internet terminal of choice for much of the world. As a result, just like the internet in the early 90s, the active population of VWs is still predominately privileged and presumably disproportionately white, reflecting patterns of privilege and exclusion that exist elsewhere in our society.

    Adding to this is the practical difficulty of creating an 'avatar of color' from open-market parts, when the market favors a particular restrictive norm (i.e., infinite variations on the theme of 23-year-old-caucasoid-supermodel). But this difficulty is also experienced by folks who want to present themselves, for example, as being middle-aged or older, or in less than perfect shape, or otherwise pay some regard to real diversity of appearance.

    World2Worlds is actually in the process of assembling an avatar library that honors the whole scope of human phenotypes and ages, and a similar affordance is promised by Linden Lab to users of their behind-the-firewall SL platform, due into Beta this week.

    I don't claim to have an academically exhaustive study of this topic, but my students must change race each semester (or gender: their call):

    http://iggyssyllabus.pbworks.com/Gender+or+Race+Switch

    Findings from last year: "noob" status led to more insults and snubs than did race or gender. That said, my students are in a writing class and learning to make claims based upon a variety of data, including personal experience.

    I'm glad to see this post and will share it with this term's class, as they are soon to embark on the experiment again.

    I do wonder about Lalo's point--"Race" can mean "nonhuman" in virtual worlds, and Furries have trouble because of stereotypes linked to griefing and sex.

    DD, don't blast the study--go ahead and read it before passing judgment. I see your point, though...and I agree broadly that "Secondly: anyone who's a seasoned SLer isn't really even paying attention to avatar look anymore."

    So I want to read the entire study, academic geek that I am.

    Important note: the study was actually conducted in There.com, which skews extremely young (mostly teens), and is relatively small, so is not necessarily a great data point in relation to Second Life.

    Ahhhhh racism, that dirty little secret that we want to sweep under the rug and pretend doesn't exist in the 'new mellineum'. It is alive and well out there in the real world. Only now-a-days it is couched in politically correct rhetoric. If there is racism in the virtual world, then it is because the virtual self is an extension to the real self. There is a school of thought that says that drinking too much does not change who a person is, it can just amplify the negative traits that are already there. I suspect that the anonymity of avatars can and does do the same.

    @Ignatius . yeah, I mean I read the study... and yeah, it's not that I'm blasting it...

    It's just that I don't think "race" is the right word per say. I would think furries or tinies have it rougher than blacks or whites.

    But, I have an interesting question: Does anyone choose to be human, and of a different race? I wonder if there are white people being black people inworld, or black being white, or asian being of another persuasion.

    Can I just call the study racist?

    @Doubledown, thanks! Now I must rush off and read the study, because I do want to know more about whites portraying other races. I chose a dark-skinned Mediterranean skin for my avatar (same as its owner). For a while, with earlier versions of the SL client, he got confused for a black man by friends who had lousy graphics cards that rendered the world very dark :)

    I gave him dreadlocks but he dresses "steampunk" most of the time. He has never, in 1000s of interactions, been a victim of overt racism. But that is one data point.

    Forgive a "second-order meta" comment about commentary about Second Life (and that I'm relatively new to the field), but I perceive a recent trend: laments that SL is becoming too much like RL, when in fact it was inevitable.

    http://lalotelling.blogspot.com/2009/10/we-are-goon-squad.html

    Bruce (above) is essentially correct -- even in the case of non-human avatars, we all bring human nature with us when we enter virtuality.

    I have been playing different "races" since I joined SL.

    I started out as a tall Nordic blonde, then changed to a slighly shorter African (based on a live model, born in Ghana), then changed to a distinctly Asiatic look (again baced on a live mode, this one born in Korea). At present I'm a mixture between the blonde and the Asian...

    And I can't say that I've noticed any difference at all, except possibly that the African got propositioned more often, but this is likely to correlate better with bust size than skin colour.

    i have many skins im not going to tell you if im black or white blue grey what ever in rl dosent matter its a place where if i want to be black for a day i can and if i want to be white so be it im there and trust me ive never had any race issues in the game over wearing a black skin and i have a fue i also have white skins, furry avies, mech, lord only knows what you could call some of the other stuff i wear and out of all that the only one ive ever been messed with or told to leave a place over is my furry avies dont look at color look at if you have fur or not cause thats where the probs come into play

    The comments to this entry are closed.